Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to NHL04 Rebuilt 2017. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Your camera choice for NHL 04 rebuilt
Classic 110 (29.7%)
Modded Overhead 102 (27.6%)
Action 13 (3.5%)
Ice 84 (22.7%)
Broadcast 52 (14.1%)
Custom (let's see it) 9 (2.4%)
Total Votes: 370
Your camera choice for NHL 04 rebuilt; What's your preferred angle?
Topic Started: Jul 25 2011, 07:15 PM (15,773 Views)
trent
Member Avatar
Project Leader
Ok... what is your preferred camera angle for the NHL 04 rebuilt?

Personally, I can't even imagine playing this game with any other than our modded overhead cam (which offers perfect control of the field and team). It's an unique camera angle among the hockey games and hands down the best I've seen.

Posted Image

What's your preferred angle?
My Blues 1995-1996 Season Report
My Blues 1998-1999 Season Report
My Flyers 1998-1999 Season Report
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Xiri
Charter Member
I voted for broadcast and overhead. I like both very much. I'm more used to play with overhead, but broadcast is nice sometimes.

A hint: playing a couple games with broadcast and position locked - you have a completely new game.
Montreal Canadiens 2016-17
Minnesota Wild 2011-12
Minnesota Wild 2010-11

"Assault someone, you get five years. In hockey, five minutes. Is this a great game or what?"
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
trent
Member Avatar
Project Leader
I like the broadcast as well... but I can't play it after I used it on NHL 2k10. New 2k games have incredible broadcast view.

The clumsy and outdated player movements bother me on broadcast, ice and action... when you play with overhead they're not apparent at all... with that angle 04 still looks as modern as anything. Classic ain't bad, either... but for total rink/game control you can't challenge the modded overhead... it's especially awesome in PP.
My Blues 1995-1996 Season Report
My Blues 1998-1999 Season Report
My Flyers 1998-1999 Season Report
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mikus1111
Member Avatar
I can feel it coming in the air tonight...
[ *  * ]
Classic, no doubt about that. Perfect view and very easy to control the players. I don't see myself playing any other camera angle. Overhead makes my computer lag too much. And I don't like the zoom level (which is very far).
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
mackdunnie
Member Avatar
Regular
[ *  * ]
Always Modded Overhead. Can see the plays and openings very well. Like mentioned earlier it also makes it look less dated.
mackshacks.com MACKS HACKS
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Franco Duck
Member Avatar
NHL.com Interface
[ *  *  *  * ]
Well, I'm used to Ice camera angle. That's why I voted for Ice.
In fact it sucks on line changes...
Gotta try the Modded Overhead which I never played with to tell you the truth. I'll try some Exhibition games and on my next season maybe I can go with this one all season long!

Regards,

Franco
MDH
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
lacky
Hall of Famer
Mikus1111,25 July 2011
10:35 PM
Overhead makes my computer lag too much. And I don't like the zoom level (which is very far).

me too!

I like modded classic view:
Posted Image

Thanks Nettles for this view :)
My Sochi 2014 olympics tournament My first tournament since some break
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jusu#25
Liiga&CHL Sound master
[ *  *  *  * ]
Modded overhead is my favorite. Broadcast is cool but i need more time to learn play with that.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
nekito3
Junior League
[ * ]
Rather overhead.
Sorry for my bad english :D

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Nobowtf
Regular
[ *  * ]
I play with Ice. Could try modded camera :P
Proud to be finnish
Detroit Red Wings Fan
Winnipeg Jets Fan
Nobo's Winnipeg Jets Dynasty
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Fel 96
Charter Member
Ice for me.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
phillyfan23
Rookie
modded overhead for me.....close enough and you can see the whole ice....
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
woodhippie
Member Avatar
Regular
[ *  * ]
Hey Guys, would like to try the modded overhead camera that you are refering to....but when i search the site for the download with 3 different browsers.... I get this kind of an error....

Your client does not have permission to get URL /custom?domains=z15.invisionfree.com%2FNHL04Rebuilt&q=overhead&sitesearch=z15.invisionfree.com%2FNHL04Rebuilt&client=pub-2404175891811072&forid=1&channel=7202546313&ie=ISO-8859-1&oe=ISO-8859-1&safe=active&cof=GALT%3A%23008000%3BGL%3A1%3BDIV%3A%23FFFFFF%3BVLC%3A663399%3BAH%3Acenter%3BBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BLBGC%3AFFFFFF%3BALC%3A0000FF%3BLC%3A0000FF%3BT%3A000000%3BGFNT%3A0000FF%3BGIMP%3A0000FF%3BLH%3A1%3BLW%3A1%3BL%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Finvisionfree.com%2Fa.gif%3BS%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Finvisionfree.com%3BFORID%3A1%3B&hl=en from this server

Can somebody post a link to the download ....? and thanks for all the great work you guys do !
Woodhippie™
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
trent
Member Avatar
Project Leader
@woodhippie: Modded overhead camera is built-in in the mod. Just choose "overhead" from the display options (or ingame pause menu) and you're all set...!!
My Blues 1995-1996 Season Report
My Blues 1998-1999 Season Report
My Flyers 1998-1999 Season Report
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
flyers90
Rookie
I have only extracted the interface, so I'm not sure if that includes the modded views. I use Classic!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · NHL 2004 General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply